Slide #1.

Project Deliverables Deliverable 4 Posted (revised 10/30/2007) Version Numbers will reflect added Deliverable numbers.
More slides like this


Slide #2.

Overview of Guidance    I shall try to upgrade / refine guidance for each deliverable as we progress. Please view this file often as it will change. Suggestions for clarity and/or consistency are always welcome.
More slides like this


Slide #3.

Format of Deliverables    All Deliverables will be via CD. Outside: Surface of CD is to clearly indicate your course number and the team number, as CGS 4308 - Team 1 or CIS 4327 – Team 1. Also include the project title. Inside: Each deliverable will be in a separate folder on the same CD, so when I access the CD, all I should see are individual folders with labels such as Deliverable n, as in Deliverable 4.  This way, I can also see enhancements to previous deliverables.
More slides like this


Slide #4.

Contents of Folder  Each Folder (i.e., Deliverable) is to contain  Management  a number of Word files discussed ahead  Artifacts  Folder: Folder Contents discussed ahead.
More slides like this


Slide #5.

Management Folder Documents (1 of 3)  1. Team Num file  In this file, you are to simply (may be a single Word file):      List the names of the team members Indicate who is team leader with phone number. Indicate who is the software quality analyst and phone List individual email accounts. 2. Iteration Plan (Include for CIS second semester deliverables)  Note that the Iteration Plan will change for each deliverable, that is, it will be refined and ‘extended.’ Each successive deliverable will contain a ‘revised’ Iteration Plan.
More slides like this


Slide #6.

Management Folder Documents (2 of 3)  3. Executive Summary  Single page document; Summarizes the contents of this folder.  What ‘activities’ were undertaken  What ‘artifacts’ were changed and rationale  Note: revising artifacts is the norm in an iterative approach to software development.  What new ‘artifacts’ were produced   Must include signatures of EACH team member that he/she has reviewed and has ‘bought off’ on the contents of this deliverable. (signatures may be virtual)  If you have not read and personally reviewed the contents of the deliverable, do not sign this form!
More slides like this


Slide #7.

Management Folder Documents (3 of 3)  4. Team Activities:    Team Software Process (TSP), and Personal Software Process (PSP) Forms 5. Software Quality Analyst Report  This will address in narrative or graphic form (your choice) the status of the project with respect to identifying and tracing requirements to date as well as efforts undertaken by you regarding testing and verification (we will discuss).
More slides like this


Slide #8.

Artifacts Folder (1 of 2)  All developed artifacts will be found here. Sometimes the artifacts will be models; other times, they will be documents. Artifacts are sample items produced by team members as a result of undertaking specific activities.   Word documents: A project Vision Document; the Risks List; the Business Rules document, etc. Artifact likely developed in Rational Rose: Your use-case diagrams, actors, etc.
More slides like this


Slide #9.

Artifacts Folder (2 of 2)  Sample artifacts developed in Rose (continued):   In general, specific components of deliverables should be found here, and a number of these should be in their own subfolders, such as the user interface prototype (linked to via Rose / Requisite Pro (optional)), Use Case diagrams, Use Case Narrative, Analysis Model, Sequence Diagrams, Communications Diagrams, architectural models, etc. We will discuss in class for each deliverable.
More slides like this


Slide #10.

Guidance on the Rose Browser  Use Case Diagrams in Use Case Folder within Use Case Model in Rose   Capture Use Cases in separate subfolders in the Use Case folder within Use Case Model in Rose (see the Rose Browser). Capture all Actors in folder within Use Case Model in Rose
More slides like this


Slide #11.

Grammar and Wording  Under NO circumstances will poor grammar or ill-conceived sentences be considered acceptable work. Remember: you only get one chance to make a first impression. Poorly done work will really hurt your grade and perception of what otherwise might be high-quality work.  EACH portion of EACH deliverable should be reviewed and ‘signed off’ by EACH team member. (as stated)  This is a TEAM responsibility!!  On the provided templates, there is room for signoff by the team / team members. Use this for verification…
More slides like this


Slide #12.

Deliverable #1 Business Modeling (Domain Analysis)
More slides like this


Slide #13.

 Deliverable #1 Business Modeling Business Domain Analysis Due: Wednesday, September 19th, 2007 start of class. Purpose:  To understand the structure and dynamics of the organization within which the application will operate;  To ensure customers, end-users, and developers understand the organization;  To derive requirements on systems to support the organization;
More slides like this


Slide #14.

Deliverable 1 – Business Model Domain Analysis Deliverable Artifacts        Business Vision Document - a text document. Business Use Case Model – captured in a Rational Rose model Business Glossary - text Business Rules – text Business Risk List - text (Domain Model - model in Rational Rose – will accommodated in Deliverable #2.) This is a hefty assignment. Start early!!
More slides like this


Slide #15.

Deliverable #1: Business Vision Document (1 of 2)  Use the appropriate forms available at:         RUP document templates are located at the site http://jdbv.sourceforge.net/RUP.html.  See also my web page. This captures (Word document) the purpose of the business enterprise. What services are they providing? What are they all about? Who are the customers? What are the goals of the business? Primary stakeholders?? This is NOT a product vision document (the product you will develop). This is about the business, enterprise, environment.)
More slides like this


Slide #16.

 Business Vision Document (2 of 2) You may use the Vision Template (see web page) but you must MODIFY it so that it does NOT address a project; rather, it will capture the vision of the enterprise itself.   Eliminate section 2. Elaborate on section 1. In Stakeholders, address those interests NOT from a project perspective but from an organization’s perspective: customers, users, etc. There is no Product Overview But your business vision document should address what the business is all about. Add major sections that you deem appropriate. This is a template. It offers organization, but it need to be rigidly adhered to.
More slides like this


Slide #17.

The Business Use Case Model (2 of 2)  When logging onto Rose, be sure to select RUP icon from the initial window.  Be also certain to notice the tool mentors – when you select a folder in the Rose Browser, a description often appears with invaluable information.  The Business Use Case Model must be developed in the Use Case View (see last slide)  This is a single model of the key business processes of the organization.
More slides like this


Slide #18.

Deliverable #1: Business Glossary (1 of 2)   Definitions of important terms used in the business. (alphabetical) Key words: (sometimes these are called ‘core abstractions.’ ) These are often the ‘things’ the business deals with. Business Entities. A Student Registration system might have key words like Course, Schedule, Payment, Registration, Student, Professor, …. What is needed here are acronyms, important definitions, basically the jargon of the organization. These will be heavily referred to when we do use cases!
More slides like this


Slide #19.

Deliverable #1: Business Glossary (1 of 2) Another key component of domain analysis is the domain model (next deliverable). Here, we supplement the glossary by adding in a graphical mode – business entities, their relationships and associations: (What’s important in business entities are the ‘attributes.’ So, for example, if you were defining a Student business entity, you might include things like: ssan, classification, gender, major, gpa, projected graduation date, ACT/SAT scores, etc. We do NOT worry about methods (operations here)  This, however, is for the next deliverable.)
More slides like this


Slide #20.

Deliverable #1: The Business Rules  Use the appropriate forms available at:      RUP document templates are located at the site http://jdbv.sourceforge.net/RUP.html.  See also my web page. The link for the Business Rules template is incorrect (points to the Business Modeling Guidelines template), so there is another link to point to the Business Rules format. See examples on my web page. These are merely samples. Be careful: The samples on my web page are Rules for an application that will be developed (later). Your Rules are simply for the organization itself - the way it does business; guiding principles. It has no relationship (at this time) to an application to be developed. Business Rules are policy declarations or conditions or guidelines that must be satisfied in running the business.
More slides like this


Slide #21.

Deliverable #1: The Business Risks List   Very general at this stage. What are some of the risks that the organization must be constantly assessing:    e.g. market share, technology awareness, new statutes from Washington D.C., trends in the industry; demographics; environmental considerations, maintaining top notch software developers, keeping developers current; training; give this some thought…. Again, this is at the organizational level. That’s it! Have fun!
More slides like this


Slide #22.

Deliverable #2 due: Wednesday, Oct 3rd – midnight Iterate Previous Work Domain Model The Product Vision Document Statement of Work
More slides like this


Slide #23.

New Directions  For Deliverable 2 and thereafter, your subfolders to the Deliverable n folder are to include:       1. 2. 3. 4. Artifacts Management Deliverable (n-1) folder (I returned to you) Revisited Deliverable (n-1) folder Be certain your Executive Summary addresses all items in these folders You may send me a zip file (e.g. UgTeam3.Deliverable’n’) via Outlook and also send the same folder to me using Digital Dropbox
More slides like this


Slide #24.

 Deliverable #2 – Artifacts Overview 1. Iterate / Review / upgrade previous artifacts   2. Build a Domain Model (precursor activity to Use Case development)   Is an essential activity to facilitate good use case development that contains glossary items and objects from the problem space (domain). This is a graphical model of Business Entities (enterprise as a whole). But these entities will become useful for your application. (major artifact this deliverable; Requires Rose) 3. Build a Product Vision Document   based on evaluation of your deliverable. Your changes should be annotated in the Executive Summary. Business Use Case Model, Business Use Cases and Business Actors – Modeled, Business Vision document – text, Business Glossary – text; Business Risks Lists; Business Rules - text Will include User Needs and Features This Vision document addresses the ‘needs’ of the client for your application. SQA people: brief your team on Needs, Features, etc., referenced in the article you are responsible for. (See ahead)> 4. Develop a Statement of Work – (Team Leader Log may be substituted)  assigning responsibilities to different roles to be accommodated on the team. This text document should be developed by the team leader in concert with individuals. Team leader must provide direction and guidance. All tasks and subtaskids should be clearly delineated. Add column to the Team Leader Log reflecting individual assignments to each task – as appropriate. You may include a ‘primary’ and a ‘backup’ if you wish. This artifact is not to be contained in the Management Folder. Rather, include it in the Artifacts Folder as the fourth item.
More slides like this


Slide #25.

Deliverable #2: Domain Model 2. Domain Model – The Domain Model should be captured as a separate folder   within the Logical View in your Rose Browser. This is a major effort that takes into consideration attributes, multiplicities, associations, etc. Be careful. the Domain Model may look like a Database Schema. It isn’t. It is similar – to a degree – to a Fully Attributed List in the Logical Model – but there are differences.    Notice also – a good domain model does not have methods (responsibilities) – only attributes and connections (associations/ dependencies) There is a decent link to a student example on my web page. Notice it is found in the Logical View (as it should). Study the Rose descriptions / options too in the specification windows associated with the business entities (classes)
More slides like this


Slide #26.

Domain Model - continued    The Domain Model is an extension of Deliverable 1. It deals with the enterprise / organization. Domain Model is essential to understanding the environment (in terms of the business entities) within which the application to be developed will function. It is an essential artifact.  See Lecture 8 on the Domain Model and the textbook. See also Tom Morgan’s slides.
More slides like this


Slide #27.

Deliverable #2: Product Vision Document   3. This represents the vision for the application you will be developing. Use the template provided.   You must take the link to the RUP documents and access the Project Management Templates: Product Vision Document. You may transfer some of the information from the Business Vision Document to this Product Vision Document.  You are to add the Problem Statements (section 2.2) and all the other items dealing with the Stakeholder and User Profiles and Stakeholder and User Needs. These are customers (now) of your application.  The Product Features Section (section 5) is essential and is to include identification of stakeholder needs and their mapping to features via the traceability matrix shown in referenced articles.  The SQA function will prepare a second Traceability Matrix that maps Features (identified earlier) back to Needs (here). So the SQA will have two matrices prepared. (See sample article for guidance)
More slides like this


Slide #28.

More on Needs and Features  When we are dealing with ‘needs’ and ‘features’ we are dealing with reasonably high levels of abstraction.  But it is critical to capture the features in the Vision Document for a new application, because it is these features that must be accommodated in the delivered system. Needs are higher level and often include very high level statements of desired needs not all of which are features which can be implemented in a system.  The Features drive the development of the use cases – our functional requirements, and the development of our supplementary specifications – our non-functional requirements.
More slides like this


Slide #29.

More on Sample Features    Features are not behavioral (like the Use Cases). These are typically text descriptions. See text books. Example of features: (We will discuss) ClassicsCD.com Web Shop Need a Secure payment method. There must be easy browsing for available titles. Users need the ability to check the status of an order. Application must provide Customer e-mail notification. The catalog shall be highly scaleable to include many titles and effective searching through those titles. The Customer shall be able to customize the Web site. The Customer shall be able to register as a user for future purchases without needing to re-enter personal information.
More slides like this


Slide #30.

Deliverable #2: Statement of Work  4. Statement of Work – developed by Team Leader. Coordinate with team members.       May take on this is a bit different than the Use Case Book. It should be a Word document. See textbook and/or templates for format What is your team plan?  Meetings/ (see forms on web page) Who does what (that is assign roles)? What are the responsibilities that must be fulfilled by each role? (use ‘tasks.’) What is your plan? (See textbook) This short document should appear in the Artifacts Folder and should include assignments by task by team member and the particulars.
More slides like this


Slide #31.

Deliverable #2: Statement of Work  Lastly,   Only turn in (hard copy) your Peer Review. (For deliverable 2) please save these for me until I return to class on Oct 15th. Turn them in to me then. Please do NOT email them to me. Team leaders should meet with me starting the day after the deliverable is due (see office hours) (For Deliverable 2, please start to see me on Oct 16th). You may simply drop by.
More slides like this


Slide #32.

Deliverable #3 Revisiting (Iterating) Previous Deliverables Use Case - Façade Iteration and Initial User Interface Prototype due: Monday 10/22 Start of Class
More slides like this


Slide #33.

Use Case - Façade Iteration Initial User Interface Prototype due: Monday 10/22    1. Management Folder: Executive Summary (overviews new artifacts with brief discussion on ALL changes/revisions to existing artifacts, such as the revised Product Vision, Domain Model, etc. as required. Include other items in this folder as customary. Revisit the Business Case (Deliverables 1 and 2) including artifacts listed below and update them. (Risks Lists; Business Rules; especially the Domain Model; Statement of Work, etc.) 2. Iterate Previous Deliverables Folders. In addition to the Management and Artifacts folders in Deliverable 3, include (as done in deliverable 2) a folder for Deliverable2 plus a folder of Deliverable2 Revisited. Cite changes undertaken in Deliverable 2 within the Executive Summary for Deliverable 3. Include revised artifacts in revisited folder. 3. Artifacts Folder (main deliverables: façade use-cases and initial interface prototype)  Façade Use-Cases. Include a use-case index (numbered) for Use Cases included in this folder. (Discussed in class and via slides. See student example link)  Use Case Index is to contain a number, Use Case name, short description, and other high level items you consider important. Construct this in tabular form using a table in Word. See power point slides for detailed attributes needed. (Artifacts Folder) See sample Use Case Index on my web page.  Façade Use-Cases should subscribe to the template found in lecture slides and student examples. Essential undertaking.  Initial Interface Prototype. (discussed ahead).
More slides like this


Slide #34.

    Guidance on Façade Iteration Develop an Overall Use Case Model (all application Use 1. Cases and Actors). (System Level Graphical Use-Case Model) 2. Develop Façade Use Case Descriptions and associated Use Case Diagrams for each Use Case cited in the System Level Use-Case Model. Use template in notes. Develop Façade Use Cases using the Kulak and Guiney book. Again, see power point lectures for required attributes. See examples of ‘reasonable’ student Use Cases examples posted. Use Rose (Use Case View) for your System Level use-case model and all of your individual use-case diagrams (one per use-case). Link the Use Case Specification text (that is, the use-cases) into Rose and ensure these descriptions are on the CD you turn in for grading. (More to be discussed: You may need to use Requisite Pro. Additional information: Visual Modeling book and Rose Basics (see power point lecture slides for examples on including your Use Cases in your Rose Model in the Use Case View.)
More slides like this


Slide #35.

More Guidance on: Facade Iteration    Remember that the Façade iteration names the use case, identifies actors, provides a short description, frequently includes pre- and post conditions, triggers, etc. But it does NOT include the any detailed actor-system interactions. See lecture notes for required attributes. Include your single System-level Use Case Model in the Use Case View (in Rose) in the folder provided by Rose. Note: this is NOT the Business Use Case Model, which has been completed; moreso, the icons are different for the actors and use cases. Be sure to note these differences.
More slides like this


Slide #36.

Guidance on User Interface Prototype       Develop User Interface Prototype needed for showing potential application interface and verification of requirements capture!!! Iterate this as needed. (Should be done in conjunction with the Façade Use Case and will (together with Domain Model) greatly assist you for Deliverable #4, your full-blown Use Case Descriptions with alternate and exception paths. Prototyping Tools. You may use any prototyping tool you wish: VB, Javascript, HTML, etc. Your prototype may include storyboarding and other links you might feel appropriate.  Most teams use static html; some use Front Page; some use Javascript, etc.  To accompany the Façade Use Cases, user interface prototype needs to be complete. Remember (more lectures ahead) the interface represents the application! Examples of initial user interface prototypes - my web page. See also (ahead) lecture slides on User Interface Design Read the textbook chapters as well – very carefully.
More slides like this


Slide #37.

Deliverable #4 Full Use Cases Model & Activity Diagrams due: 11/14 (Wednesday) – Start of Class   Management Folder: Executive Summary, Team and Individual Logs, Team Num File, SQA Report as usual, and the Statement of Work (SOW) Artifacts Folder:      1. Focused Use Case Descriptions and associated Use Case Diagrams for each Use Case. Use Rose (Use Case View) and Requisite Pro* Use Kulak and Guiney book (Use Cases); Visual Modeling book and Rose Basics (power point slides for examples.) *CEN 6016 Students only 2. Activity Diagrams: Each Use Case is to be accompanied by an Activity Diagram that indicates flow for all paths in the Use Case 3. Traceability Matrices (forward and backward) features  Use Cases  Revisit Deliverable 3 Folder. Document artifacts changed. Include (name) any changes to Deliverable 3 artifacts in Deliverable 4 Executive Summary. Then, of course, include these changes in Deliverable3Revisited folder.  Your Use Case Diagrams for individual use-cases) will likely be supplemented with Included or Extended Use Cases, as appropriate. Redo your Use Case Model (Overall) for the Application. This is the System Use Case Model. Be certain also to view the new sample SOW link on my web page. This is a good template and contains guidance on the individual logs as well. (Individual logs may be included in a single folder in the Management Folder, if desired). 
More slides like this


Slide #38.

Guidance on Deliverable #4: ‘Complete’ Use Case Model     Executive Summary – as usual; All on CD. Complete Use Case Model and Use Case Diagrams for each Use Case – This is a major assignment. Consider alternative, exception flows, and ‘sub-flows’, using extension points as appropriate. Reflect any use cases you feel are ‘included’ or ‘extending.’ Activity Diagrams – one per Use Case (must include all alternate paths) (Include as package in Rose Model) Put Use Cases into groups – packages should include use cases that ‘seem’ to go together functionally, like the GUI or those that address specific business activities.   (These will help in our architecture – as these will become likely subsystems).  Iterate on the Use Case Model and/or your User Interface Prototype (and any other documents) from Deliverable #3 as appropriate Document that you have changed this and other artifacts in your Deliverable 4 Executive Summary.
More slides like this


Slide #39.

Guidance on Deliverable #4: ‘Complete’ Use Case Model  Allocate functional requirements to use cases via the stories of interchange. (and domain objects) This is a painstaking and long task! It will underpin your entire design. Spend time here!!!! Recognize that Use Cases are NOT functional requirements; rather, they are stories of actor-application interactions which contain the required functionality.  All customer functionality should be accounted for here. Be certain to use your Domain Model and italicize or bold all references to entities in the domain model or glossary found in your use-case specification.  Ensure everything the customer desires is accounted for!
More slides like this


Slide #40.

 Keep the alternatives /exceptions WITH the use case. Subflows, if used, should be included with the use case and not made separate. See examples on web page.  Use the User-Interface to ensure all functionality is captured. One should be able to read a use-case and see how to test the use-case flow of events via the interface prototype.  Develop Activity Diagrams – one per Use Case – that captures all paths (scenarios) in a Use Case. See Visual Modeling text for examples and use Rose.  Activity Diagrams should be placed in the Use Case View under Use Case Models in a Folder entitled Activity Diagrams  Traceability Matrices – add to Needs to Features and Features to Needs. This deliverable includes Features to Use Cases and Use Cases back to Features.  You have plenty of time. But don’t wait until next week to start.  When I ‘open’ your CD, I should see four folders; Deliverable 1, Deliverable 2, …, Deliverable 4. Please use these names. Thnx.
More slides like this