Not to mention the Internet’s beginnings in 1969 (no thanks to Al Gore) http://archive.computerhistory.org/projects/Visible_Storage/VSR_detail_panels/ http://nasa.gov http://www.woodstock.com/gallery/home-gallery/
Hawaii’s Current Model for ECE Collaboration Good Beginnings Coordinating Structure/Act 77 Oahu Good Beginnings Community Council Communit y Initiatives Good Beginnings County Coordinator Maui Good Beginnings Community Council Hawaii Good Beginnings Community Council Communit Communit y Initiatives Good Beginnings County Coordinator y Initiatives Good Beginnings County Coordinator Good Beginnings Alliance GBA Staf GBA Standing Committee Personnel & Finance Kauai Good Beginnings Community Council 14 Member Board of Directors Institutional and Individual Members Interdepartmental Council 8 Members DOE, DHS, DOH, DLIR, DBEDT Governor’s Office, Philanthropy, Business Communit y Initiatives Good Beginnings County Coordinator GBA Advisory Group Service integration/Coordination Data Collection Public Engagement Finance/ Resource Development Quality Assurance EC Career Development Coalition Kia’Ika ‘Ike (Director’s Group) School Readiness Taskforce
Sources IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Summary for Policymakers V. Ramaswamy et.al., “Anthropogenic and Natural Influences in the Evolution of Lower Stratospheric Cooling,” Science 311 (24 February 2006), 1138-1141 National Research Council (NRC), 2006. Surface Temperature Reconstructions For the Last 2,000 Years. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/climate/research/ anomalies/index.html http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp http://climate.nasa.gov/ Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis, IPCC, January 2001. http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/news/20100121/ http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/ 01apr_deepsolarminimum.htm http://www.eoearth.org/article/Climate_change_FAQs#gen0 Forster, P., V. Ramaswamy, P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, R. Betts, D.W. Fahey, J. Haywood, J. Lean, D.C. Lowe, G. Myhre, J. Nganga, R. Prinn, G. Raga, M. Schulz and R. Van Dorland, 2007: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Understanding and Responding to Climate Change: National Academy of Sciences http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cmb-faq/anomalies.php#anomalies http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/ http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/mann2008/mann2008.html Oreskes, Naomi (2007). "The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change: How Do We Know We’re Not Wrong?". In DiMento, Joseph F. C.; Doughman, Pamela M.. Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren. The MIT Press. p. 68. http://www.bis.gov.uk/go-science/climatescience http://www.brighton73.freeserve.co.uk/gw/globalwarmingfaq.htm http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/literacy.html http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/faq_s/glance_faq_science.cfm Plus many other links for the graphs and illustrations, most of which came from NASA and IPCC.
24 Functions are not Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods F are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions
Similarity Features for Supervised Ranking Mention/Concept Attribute Name Spelling match KB link mining Name Gazetteer Document Lexical surface Entity Context Profiling Concept Topic KB Link Mining Popularity Position Genre Local Context Type Relation/Event Coreference Web Frequency Description Exact string match, acronym match, alias match, string matching… Name pairs mined from KB text redirect and disambiguation pages Organization and geo-political entity abbreviation gazetteers Words in KB facts, KB text, mention name, mention text. Tf.idf of words and ngrams Mention name appears early in KB text Genre of the mention text (newswire, blog, …) Lexical and part-of-speech tags of context words Mention concept type, subtype Concepts co-occurred, attributes/relations/events with mention Co-reference links between the source document and the KB text Slot fills of the mention, concept attributes stored in KB infobox Ontology extracted from KB text Topics (identity and lexical similarity) for the mention text and KB text Attributes extracted from hyperlink graphs of the KB text Top KB text ranked by search engine and its length Frequency in KB texts • (Ji et al., 2011; Zheng et al., 2010; Dredze et al., 2010; Anastacio et al., 2011) 17
“How do I do x?” • How to calculate uncertainties in CN (searched coordination+number+uncertainty) – https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit%40millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg04767.html • Significance of correlation values – https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit%40millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg05364.html • How do I do the Hamilton test (example) – https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit%40millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg04931.html • How to fit coordination number – https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit%40millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg03650.html • How to use restraints: – https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit%40millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg02299.html – https://www.mail-archive.com/ifeffit%40millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/msg01444.html – http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/pipermail/ifeffit/2003-July/000401.html • How do I do dopants – https://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/documents/Artemis/extended/dopants.html – https://bruceravel.github.io/demeter/artug/extended/dopants.html • How do I do “X”? – Search the internet and/or IFEFFIT mail list and /or post questions
The “Nader Effect” • A fundamental virtue of AV (and Coombs) is that it precludes the “Nader effect,” i.e., – the fact that a minor candidate (i.e., one who wins only a small percent of the vote) can be a spoiler under FPTP (in the manner of Ralph Nader in FL [and therefore the US as a whole] in 2000). • Under AV (and Coombs), (most) Nader voters could have (and presumably would have) ranked Gore second, so – their votes would have transferred to Gore in the runoff (as if Nader were not on the ballot or all Nader voters had voted “tactically” under FPTP). • However, if Nader and been a third “major” candidate, rather than a “minor” candidate, he might still have been a spoiler under AV. – Suppose that Nader had been more “centrist,” • so Gore had been “squeezed” between Bush and Nader, • rendering Gore the Plurality Loser, while still the Condorcet winner. – The runoff then would have been Bush and Nader, rather than Bush and Gore, and Bush would (as the near Majority Winner, even if most [but not quite all] Gore voters ranked Nader over Bush) have won the runoff.
