bond 1.00% 0.99% 0.95% 0.89% 0.81% 0.71% 0.59% 0.45% 0.31% 0.16% 0.00% s&p500 0.00% 0.16% 0.31% 0.45% 0.59% 0.71% 0.81% 0.89% 0.95% 0.99% 1.00% 100.080 100.750 100.000 100.280 100.692 100.025 100.091 100.081 100.081 109.817 109.100 109.240 100.110 100.617 100.000 100.264 100.582 100.004 100.069 100.058 100.057 108.012 108.530 108.577 100.141 100.452 100.000 100.217 100.495 100.000 100.066 100.038 100.040 106.049 107.784 107.718 100.157 100.276 100.000 100.137 100.467 100.021 100.093 100.021 100.040 104.041 106.995 106.790 100.146 100.143 100.000 100.051 100.607 100.087 100.162 100.027 100.082 102.318 106.548 106.179 100.131 100.151 100.000 100.079 101.156 100.242 100.288 100.120 100.210 101.614 107.355 106.789 100.170 100.359 100.000 100.370 102.251 100.462 100.425 100.338 100.415 103.003 110.991 110.180 100.263 100.665 100.000 100.559 103.114 100.517 100.396 100.477 100.496 106.862 119.270 118.149 100.400 100.834 100.088 100.000 102.362 100.471 100.434 100.517 100.467 111.456 135.055 133.594 101.346 101.361 101.198 100.000 101.509 101.255 101.536 101.334 101.324 114.216 170.918 170.345 100.402 100.427 100.310 100.000 100.405 100.132 100.288 100.150 100.296 107.440 142.314 125.169 BEKK DIAGONAL - VT BEKK SCALAR BEKK SCALAR - VT DCC-ASY-GEN DCC-ASYMMETRIC DCC-GENERALIZED DCC-IMA DCC-MR DCC-RANK FIXED (all sample) OGARCH 1 OGARCH 2 Average 100.159 100.403 100.000 100.033 101.093 100.147 100.204 100.142 100.174 106.648 120.267 118.258 Table 157: sample variance of minimum variance portfolios subject to a required return of 1 (sample: 1001-end) 39
View full slide show
bond 1.00% 0.99% 0.95% 0.89% 0.81% 0.71% 0.59% 0.45% 0.31% 0.16% 0.00% s&p500 0.00% 0.16% 0.31% 0.45% 0.59% 0.71% 0.81% 0.89% 0.95% 0.99% 1.00% 100.511 100.931 100.000 100.253 100.625 100.402 100.458 112.560 104.676 120.472 111.264 100.462 101.745 100.557 101.014 100.000 100.176 100.481 100.330 100.364 112.188 104.607 117.156 109.198 100.442 101.654 100.592 101.162 100.000 100.112 100.330 100.260 100.276 111.464 104.427 113.237 106.905 100.480 101.546 100.561 101.393 100.000 100.062 100.170 100.168 100.190 110.313 104.131 108.851 104.490 100.536 101.422 100.392 101.578 100.000 100.017 100.005 100.045 100.093 108.717 103.743 104.476 102.268 100.524 101.277 100.328 101.471 100.012 100.079 100.000 100.073 100.105 106.990 103.500 101.517 101.107 100.512 101.239 100.636 101.218 100.000 100.390 100.411 100.524 100.441 105.665 103.734 102.748 102.429 100.644 101.479 100.674 100.912 100.000 100.859 101.066 101.155 101.006 104.578 104.064 110.842 106.870 100.639 101.836 100.076 100.534 100.000 101.284 101.439 101.407 101.385 104.130 103.176 121.875 112.237 100.183 102.002 100.601 100.815 101.616 101.368 101.574 101.333 101.520 110.939 101.852 123.302 114.554 100.000 101.743 100.498 101.415 101.151 100.000 100.297 100.245 100.081 114.037 107.580 109.876 107.572 100.197 102.290 EXP-SM MA(20) MA(100) DCC-IMA (recursive) DCC-MR (recursive) DCC-ASY (recursive) DCC-RANK (recursive) OGARCH1 (recursive) OGARCH2 (recursive) FIXED (sample 1-1000) FIXED (daily update) DCC-ASY-GEN (recursive) DCC-GEN (recursive) Average 100.238 100.874 100.000 100.165 100.328 100.287 100.285 108.954 103.868 111.942 106.909 100.165 101.400 Table 158: sample variance of minimum variance portfolios subject to a required return of 1 (sample: 1001-end) 42
View full slide show
Candidate Progress For every 100 candidates that entered the CFA Program: In 1985 In 1996 27 candidates had earned their charters within 5 years 22 candidates had earned their charters within 5 years Successful candidates average 4 years in the program. CFA Institute
View full slide show
NSU’s NSU’s 17 17 Academic Academic Institutes Institutes  Brief Therapy Institute  Lifelong Learning Institute  Community Resolution Services  National Coral Reef Institute  Criminal Justice Institute Brief Therapy Institute   The Eye Institute Community Resolution Services  Options National Coral Reef Institute  Guy Harvey Research Institute Criminal Justice Institute     Hudson The EyeInstitute Instituteof Entrepreneurship and Executive Education Guy Harvey Research Institute  Institute of Trauma and Victimization Hudson Institute of International Institute Franchise Entrepreneurship andfor Executive  Education Education  Southeast Rumbaugh-Goodwin Institute for Institute for Cross-  Institute of Trauma and Victimization   Tyler Institute Institute The Language  International Institute for Franchise Education   Women’s Tyler Institute Resource       National Lifelong Learning Institute Institute for Educational Rumbaugh-Goodwin Institute for National Institute for Educational Cancer Research Options CancerCounseling Research Cultural Southeast Institute for Cross South Florida Ocean Cultural Counseling Measurement Center  South Florida Ocean The LanguageCenter Institute Measurement Institute Women’s Resource Institute
View full slide show
The City University of New York 2016-2017 Year-End Financial Report Expenditures Comparison: Percent of Total Expenditure by College FY2016 Expenditures Adjunct/ PS Regular Temp Service Summer FY2017 Expenditures Total PS OTPS Total Exp PS Regular Adjunct / Summe r Temp Service Total PS Total Proj. Exp OTPS Baruch College Brooklyn College City College Hunter College John Jay College Lehman College Medgar Evers College NYC College of Technology Queens College College of Staten Island York College Graduate Center CUNY School of Law School of Journalism School of Professional Studies School of Public Health 79.5% 78.6% 81.0% 76.5% 73.0% 79.5% 79.4% 69.5% 7.6% 6.1% 3.9% 9.4% 8.7% 7.3% 7.8% 15.0% 2.6% 4.9% 3.1% 4.1% 3.7% 2.4% 3.6% 2.1% 89.7% 89.6% 88.0% 90.1% 85.5% 89.2% 90.8% 86.7% 10.3% 10.4% 12.0% 9.9% 14.5% 10.8% 9.2% 13.3% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 81.2% 79.5% 81.4% 76.9% 74.5% 79.8% 78.0% 72.2% 8.0% 6.8% 5.1% 10.2% 9.6% 8.6% 9.5% 17.2% 2.5% 5.0% 3.3% 4.6% 3.9% 2.7% 4.6% 2.1% 91.7% 91.3% 89.8% 91.7% 87.9% 91.1% 92.1% 91.5% 8.3% 8.7% 10.2% 8.3% 12.1% 8.9% 7.9% 8.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 77.9% 76.1% 77.2% 58.2% 70.0% 57.3% 62.4% 7.7% 8.2% 9.4% 0.5% 1.4% 7.2% 12.4% 3.6% 5.0% 2.6% 10.5% 4.2% 5.2% 4.7% 89.2% 89.3% 89.2% 69.2% 75.6% 69.7% 79.5% 10.8% 10.7% 10.8% 30.8% 24.4% 30.3% 20.5% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 79.3% 78.2% 78.9% 58.3% 72.8% 74.5% 62.3% 8.3% 10.0% 9.9% 0.6% 2.3% 9.4% 14.7% 4.0% 4.1% 2.7% 12.7% 5.4% 7.8% 5.5% 91.6% 92.3% 91.4% 71.6% 80.5% 91.7% 82.5% 8.4% 7.7% 8.6% 28.4% 19.5% 8.3% 17.5% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% - - - - - - 79.3% 0.5% 6.0% 85.9% 14.1% 100.0% Senior College Total 75.2% 7.3% 4.2% 86.6% 13.4% 100.0% 76.5% 8.3% 4.5% 89.3% 10.7% 100.0% BMCC Bronx CC Guttman CC Hostos CC Kingsborough CC LaGuardia CC Queensborough CC 63.6% 77.2% 62.7% 72.3% 71.7% 69.4% 74.5% 11.6% 7.8% 2.4% 7.4% 10.1% 10.2% 10.2% 3.0% 4.1% 4.0% 3.3% 6.9% 4.6% 3.2% 78.2% 89.1% 69.1% 83.0% 88.7% 84.2% 87.9% 21.8% 10.9% 30.9% 17.0% 11.3% 15.8% 12.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 65.9% 78.6% 64.0% 74.7% 73.2% 72.6% 76.2% 11.6% 8.0% 2.7% 7.4% 9.7% 10.3% 9.7% 3.0% 4.2% 4.4% 3.4% 6.8% 4.7% 3.0% 80.5% 90.9% 71.2% 85.5% 89.8% 87.6% 88.9% 19.5% 9.1% 28.8% 14.5% 10.2% 12.4% 11.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Community College Total 70.3% 9.7% 4.2% 84.1% 15.9% 100.0% 72.4% 9.6% 4.1% 86.1% 13.9% 100.0% 9 University Total 73.7% 8.0% 4.2% 85.9% 14.1% 100.0% 75.3% 8.7% 4.4% 88.4% 11.6% 100.0%
View full slide show
It’s really not this bad! Office Officeofofthe theDirector Director National NationalInstitute Institute on onAging Aging National NationalInstitute Institute on onAlcohol AlcoholAbuse Abuse and andAlcoholism Alcoholism National NationalInstitute Institute ofofAllergy Allergyand and Infectious InfectiousDiseases Diseases National NationalInstitute Institute ofofArthritis Arthritisand and Musculoskeletal Musculoskeletal and andSkin SkinDiseases Diseases National NationalCancer Cancer Institute Institute Eunice EuniceKennedy Kennedy Shriver ShriverNational NationalInstitute Institute ofofChild ChildHealth Healthand and Human HumanDevelopment Development National NationalInstitute Instituteon on Deafness Deafnessand andOther Other Communication Communication Disorders Disorders National NationalInstitute Institute ofofDental Dentaland and Craniofacial Craniofacial Research Research National NationalInstitute Institute ofofDiabetes Diabetesand and Digestive Digestiveand and Kidney Diseases Kidney Diseases National NationalInstitute Institute on onDrug DrugAbuse Abuse National NationalInstitute Institute ofofEnvironmental Environmental Health Sciences Health Sciences National NationalEye Eye Institute Institute National NationalInstitute Institute ofofGeneral General Medical Sciences Medical Sciences National NationalHeart, Heart, Lung, Lung,and andBlood Blood Institute Institute National NationalHuman Human Genome GenomeResearch Research Institute Institute National NationalInstitute Institute ofofMental MentalHealth Health National NationalInstitute Institute ofofNeurological Neurological Disorders Disordersand and Stroke Stroke National NationalInstitute Institute ofofNursing NursingResearch Research National NationalCenter Center for forComplementary Complementary and Alternative and Alternative Medicine Medicine John JohnE. E.Fogarty Fogarty International International Center Center National NationalCenter Center for forResearch Research Resources Resources National NationalLibrary Library ofofMedicine Medicine National NationalInstitute Instituteofof Biomedical BiomedicalImaging Imaging and andBioengineering Bioengineering Clinical ClinicalCenter Center Understanding NIH Center Centerfor for Information Information Technology Technology Slide 10 National NationalInstitute Instituteon on Minority MinorityHealth Healthand and Health Disparities Health Disparities Center Centerfor for Scientific ScientificReview Review 8 November 2017
View full slide show
National Institutes of Health Office Officeof ofthe theDirector Director National NationalInstitute Institute on onAging Aging National NationalInstitute Institute on onAlcohol AlcoholAbuse Abuse and andAlcoholism Alcoholism National NationalInstitute Institute of ofAllergy Allergyand and Infectious InfectiousDiseases Diseases National NationalInstitute Institute of ofArthritis Arthritisand and Musculoskeletal Musculoskeletal and andSkin SkinDiseases Diseases National NationalCancer Cancer Institute Institute National NationalInstitute Institute of ofChild ChildHealth Health and andHuman Human Development Development National NationalInstitute Instituteon on Deafness Deafnessand andOther Other Communication Communication Disorders Disorders National NationalInstitute Institute of ofDental Dentaland and Craniofacial Craniofacial Research Research National NationalInstitute Institute of ofDiabetes Diabetesand and Digestive Digestiveand and Kidney KidneyDiseases Diseases National NationalInstitute Institute on onDrug DrugAbuse Abuse National NationalInstitute Institute of ofEnvironmental Environmental Health HealthSciences Sciences National NationalEye Eye Institute Institute National NationalInstitute Institute of ofGeneral General Medical MedicalSciences Sciences National NationalHeart, Heart, Lung, Lung,and andBlood Blood Institute Institute National NationalHuman Human Genome GenomeResearch Research Institute Institute National NationalInstitute Institute of ofMental MentalHealth Health National NationalInstitute Institute of ofNeurological Neurological Disorders Disordersand and Stroke Stroke National NationalInstitute Institute of ofNursing NursingResearch Research National NationalInstitute Instituteof of Biomedical BiomedicalImaging Imaging and andBioengineering Bioengineering National NationalCenter Center for forComplementary Complementary and andAlternative Alternative Medicine Medicine Fogarty Fogarty International International Center Center National NationalCenter Center for forResearch Research Resources Resources National NationalLibrary Library of ofMedicine Medicine National NationalCenter Centeron on Minority Health Minority Healthand and Health HealthDisparities Disparities Clinical ClinicalCenter Center Center Centerfor for Information Information Technology Technology Center for Scientific Review
View full slide show
  Student #1 Student #2 Student #3 Student #4 Student #5 Student #6 Student #7 Student #8 Student #9 Student #10 Student #11 Student #12 Student #13 Student #14 Student #15   Student #16   Student #17   Student #18   Student #19   Student #20   Student #21     Techniq ue   Desig n   Presenta tion   TOTA L POIN TS 87   Creativ ity And Conce pt 87 73 100 87% 93 100 100 93 80 87 93 80 87 87 87 100 73 80 87 93 87 87 87 100 100 100 100 100 87 87 87 100 97%   85%   90%   83%   90%   100%   100 100 100 100 87 87 87 87 100 100 100 100 87 93 100 93 80 87 93 93 100 100 100 100 67 87 87 87 100%   82% 80 87 93 80 85% 87 87 93 80 87% 100 100 100 100 100% 67 93 93 87 85% 87 100 100 93 95% 87 100 100 100 97% 90% 100%   87%   100%   93%   88% The results show an overall above average achievement and consistency within each category of scoring. Based on the data, emphasis will continue in areas of technique and design. The high scores in the presentation area are credited to the formal critiques and informal presentations conducted in each design course. The rubric is shared with the students throughout the semester, making each student aware of the assessment areas and criteria. Every required deliverable is compared against the rubric by the student to determine the scoring possibilities. Students are given immediate feedback by all evaluators at the reception. A discussion by students and faculty also takes place in a classroom critique following the reception.
View full slide show
National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research Office of the Director National Institute on Aging National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases National Cancer Institute National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Eye Institute National Institute of General Medical Sciences National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Human Genome Research Institute National Institute of Mental Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Fogarty International Center National Center for Research Resources National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine NIH Clinical Center Center for Information Technology National Library of Medicine Center for Scientific Review National Institute of Nursing Research National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering No funding authority3
View full slide show
Organizational Structure of NIH Office of the Director http://www.nih.gov/ic d National Institute on Aging National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases National Cancer Institute National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases National Institute on Drug Abuse National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Eye Institute National Institute of General Medical Sciences National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute National Human Genome Research Institute National Institute of Mental Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke National Institute of Nursing Research National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Fogarty International Center National Center for Research Resources National Library of Medicine National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering No funding authority 18 18
View full slide show
Progress Schedule Performance Index Project Proposals Background Research Tech nical Paper (Abstract/Intro) Tech nical Paper (Background) Tech nical Paper (Current Work) Tech nical Paper (Design Analysis) Tech nical Paper (Final Correlations) Design Proposals Design (Detail Spec Drawings Pro-E) Design (Data Computations) Design Software Analysis Machining (Casing) Machining (Turbine) Machining (Final Assembly) Testing (Initial) Testing (Modifications) Testing (Final) Project Status Report/Demonstration Final Presentation Overall Av erage = 102.68 % (21 days/21 days) * 100 = 100% (21 days/28 days) * 100 = 75% (14 days/14 days) * 100 = 100% (14 days/28 days) * 100 = 75% (14 days/21 days) * 100 = 67% (14 days/7 days) * 100 = 200% (42 days/42 days) * 100 = 100% (28 days/28 days) * 100 = 100% (28 days/28 days) * 100 = 100% (28 days/28 days) * 100 = 100% (14 days/21 days) * 100 = 67% (7 days/7 days) * 100 = 100% (14 days/14 days) * 100 = 100% (14 days/7 days) * 100 = 200% (7 days/7 days) * 100 = 100% (14 days/14 days)* 100 = 100% (14 days/21 days)* 100 = 67% (14 days/14 days)* 100 = 100% (7 days/7 days) * 100 = 100%
View full slide show
Frequency Distribution  Example: Marada Inn Guests staying at Marada Inn were asked to rate the quality of their accommodations as being excellent, above average, average, below average, or Above Average Below Average poor.Average The Average Above Average Above Average ratings provided by a sample of 20Above guests are: Above Average Average Above Average Average Above Average Below Average Poor Excellent Above Average Average Below Average Poor Above Average Average © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied Slide 5 or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
View full slide show
Frequency Distribution  Example: Marada Inn Guests staying at Marada Inn were asked to rate the quality of their accommodations as being excellent, above average, average, below average, or poor. The ratings provided by a sample of 20 guests are: Above Average Below Average Average Above Average Above Average Above Average Below Average Above Average Below Average Poor Average Poor Above Average Above Average Excellent Average Above Average Average Above Average Average 5
View full slide show
Example: Marada Inn Guests staying at Marada Inn were asked to rate the quality of their accommodations as being excellent, above average, average, below average, or poor. The ratings provided by a sample of 20 quests are shown below. Below Average Average Above Average Above Average Above Average Above Average Above Average Below Average Below Average Average Poor Poor Above Average Excellent Above Average Average Above Average Average Above Average Average © 2003 Thomson/South-Western 5
View full slide show
Alternative Electoral Systems • On an FTPT (“First-Past-The Post”) ballot, – voters put an “X” beside the name of the candidate they wish to vote for, and – the candidate with the most votes is elected. • On an AV (“Alternative Vote”; known as Instant Runoff Voting [IRV] in US) ballot, voters rank the candidates in order of preference. – If one candidate has a majority of first preferences, that candidate is elected. – If no candidate is supported by a majority of first preferences, • the candidate with the fewest first preferences is eliminated and • his or her ballots are transferred to other candidates on the basis of the second preferences expressed on the ballots for the eliminated candidate. • This process is repeated until one candidate is supported by a majority of ballots and is elected. • “If you like the Alternative Vote, you ought to know about the Coombs rule” (Grofman and Feld, 2004): similar AV but with a different elimination rule: – the candidate with the most last preferences is eliminated. Bernard Grofman and Scott Feld, “If You Like the Alternative Vote (a.k.a. the Instant Runoff), Then You Ought to Know about the Coombs Rule,” Electoral Studies, 2004.
View full slide show
// determine the average of an arbitrary number of grades public void DetermineClassAverage() { int total; // sum of grades int gradeCounter; // number of grades entered int grade; // grade value double average; // number with decimal point for average // initialization phase total = 0; // initialize total gradeCounter = 0; // initialize loop counter // processing phase // prompt for and read a grade from the user Console.Write( "Enter grade or -1 to quit: " ); grade = Convert.ToInt32( Console.ReadLine() ); Avoid infinite loop! // loop until sentinel value is read from the user while ( grade != -1 ) { total = total + grade; // add grade to total gradeCounter = gradeCounter + 1; // increment counter // prompt for and read the next grade from the user Console.Write( "Enter grade or -1 to quit: " ); grade = Convert.ToInt32( Console.ReadLine() ); } // end while // termination phase // if the user entered at least one grade... if ( gradeCounter != 0 ) { // calculate the average of all the grades entered average = ( double ) total / gradeCounter; Avoid division by 0 // display the total and average (with two digits of precision) Console.WriteLine( "\nTotal of the {0} grades entered is {1}", gradeCounter, total ); Console.WriteLine( "Class average is {0:F}", average ); } // end if else // no grades were entered, so output error message Console.WriteLine( "No grades were entered" ); } // end method DetermineClassAverage } 40
View full slide show
Example: Marada Inn Guests staying at Marada Inn were asked to rate the quality of their accommodations as being excellent, above average, average, below average, or poor. The ratings provided by a sample of 20 guestsAverage are: Below Average Above Average Above Average Above Average Average Above Average Average Above Average Above Average Below Average Poor Excellent Above Average Average Above Average Below Average Poor Above Average Average
View full slide show