President’s Dining Room Room C Room B Room A 10:00 AM – 10:50 AM Getting Students to Read: A Roundtable Discussion on the Best Practices of Reading Quizzes Milton Fuentes, Pablo R Casado Nunez Acquiring foundational knowledge is critical to deep learning and course engagement (Lang, 2016). One way students can secure this knowledge is by completing the weekly reading assignments (Hacker, 2010). However, the research suggests that students struggle with reading required assignments (Brown & Tallon, 2015; Maurer & Longfield, 2015; Johnson & Kiviniemi, 2009); a complaint heard often by faculty at MSU. Reading quizzes have been found to assist with this teaching challenge (Lang, 2016; Tropman, 2014; Wang and Selby, 2017). Reading quizzes are pre-class assessments that are “…usually credit-carrying, low-stakes, short tests used not just to assess student comprehension from a preclass preparatory assignment (Gierasch et al., 2015), but mainly to increase the likelihood that students read the assigned material and have some knowledge of the day’s topic” (Wang and Selby, 2017, p. 418). Tropman (2014) surveyed students in her introductory ethics course and an advanced philosophy course and found that students attitudes toward reading quizzes were generally favorable. The students reported that reading quizzes encouraged them to read, contribute toward class discussion, and secure a better grade. Wand and Selby (2017) assert that this strategy can be further enhanced through error analysis, the process of having students consider their incorrect quiz answers and secure the necessary information to ensure a correct understanding of the course material. In this roundtable, faculty will be introduced to the best practices associated with reading quizzes as well consider the advantages and disadvantages of this teaching strategy for their particular teaching approach and discipline. Pedagogical Research: The Role of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) in Studying One’s Own Teaching: Part One Mousumi Bose, Kathy Gainor, Brian Abrams, Reba Wissner Research in pedagogy is essential to maintaining the integrity of educational approaches, improving teaching, and disseminating information on new practices within a field. While ethical issues arise in any research setting, there are unique considerations in the research of educational activities. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) is designed to review research protocols with the purpose of protecting the safety, privacy, and well-being of research participants. In the case of pedagogical research, educational settings, teaching approaches, and potential vulnerability of the learner population are just a few factors that must be carefully examined in the process of IRB approval. These factors can influence protocol development and the level of IRB review a study will receive. Nevertheless, the IRB should not be considered a barrier but rather a rigorous discourse aimed at conducting both ethical and scientifically sound research in pedagogy. The purpose of this panel is to discuss the IRB process in two distinct research studies on the instructors’ own teaching at MSU, and how the IRB review process helped guide these studies towards providing valuable information on learning outcomes. Dealing with Controversial Issues in the Classroom: Healthcare, Abortion, and “You-Fill-in-the-Blank" Hannah Helmy, Marylou Naumoff, Lisa Lieberman How can we encourage students to have productive conversations about topics for which public discourse is often highly politicized, moralistic, and laden with misinformation and “alternative” facts? In this session, we will explore how to engage students in dialogue about topics such as abortion, the right to healthcare, and personal responsibility for health. In particular, we will draw upon our experiences and those of faculty in the room to discuss effective strategies to address misconceptions, acknowledge personal biases (of both faculty and students), and foster fruitful exchanges of information while being inclusive of the diverse viewpoints our students bring to these conversations. We welcome faculty at any level of experience to join us and share their insights. Supporting Underprepared Writers Laura Field, Elizabeth Martin, Jessica Restaino In late Spring 2016, First Year Writing learned that we would be losing our Introduction to Writing course, which is a course that provides some of our underprepared students with an additional semester of college writing instruction. As a program, we found ourselves faced with a population of students who needed additional support with their writing, but who were matriculated into the traditional WRIT105 College Writing classroom. Our project for the ETF program has been to develop a standard syllabus to guide instructors in our program with best practices. In this roundtable, we will discuss our student populations ongoing needs and will share strategies that we developed to begin to support them. Our hope is that attendees will leave with a better understanding of who these students are and some techniques they can implement in their own writing assignments.
Senate Goals for 2017-2018 Advocate to ensure institutional planning processes and changes are faculty driven Ensure Senate driven implementation of Guided Pathways Advocate remedies to assist math discipline in the face of AB 705 & changes to CSU requirements Advocate a process for greater faculty input and project management continuity in building and campus facilities programming Help students by working to increase services and support and by advocating institutional plans and program changes to meet their needs Advocate for enhancements to programs & services to assist students in light of changes in state policy Explore Adult Education as vehicle to help under-prepared students with skill development required for first year success Work to ensure completion of a Strategic Enrollment Plan, including addressing the needs of the South Gate Education Center Encourage support for students in the face of new federal policies Boost Academic Senate scholarship fundraising efforts Advocate for our homeless and hungry students Boost faculty engagement in collegial activities Complete and publish Guide for Faculty Hiring Policy Hold Senate Retreat & Social in fall & spring Increase faculty involvement at District and State Senate activities as well as accreditation Ensure all faculty have access to the Faculty Center Revise Constitution to add SG & Chairs Council voting members to Senate