24 Functions are not Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods F are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods Methods are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are are not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not not Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions Functions
Webinar Outlines Webinar L1: Part I (today) • • • • • • Introduction and brief overview of the strengths approach A model and framework for assessment in strengths-based TR/RT practice The ecological approach to strengths-based assessment Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Leisure Domain Tools for assessment of global outcomes of TR/RT services: Well-Being Questions, discussion Webinar L2: Part II (October 8) • • • • • • • Brief overview of the strengths approach and a framework for assessment from Part I Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Psychological/Emotional Domain Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Cognitive Domain Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Social Domain Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Physical Domain Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Spiritual Domain Questions, discussion 3
Webinar Outlines Webinar L1: Part I (October 1) • • • • • • Introduction and brief overview of the strengths approach A model and framework for assessment in strengths-based TR/RT practice The ecological approach to strengths-based assessment Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Leisure Domain Tools for assessment of global outcomes of TR/RT services: Well-Being Questions, discussion Webinar L2: Part II (today) • • • • • • • Brief overview of the strengths approach and a framework for assessment from Part I Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Psychological/Emotional Domain Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Cognitive Domain Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Social Domain Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Physical Domain Tools for assessment of internal and external strengths: Spiritual Domain Questions, discussion 3
III. US Evaluation Forms The University of Tennessee at Martin Stude nt Teaching Performance Assessment Evaluation b y University Supervisor STUDENT TEACHER (Last, First, Middle) MAJOR/LICENSURE AREA DATE PREPARED Candidate Evaluation Observation Report # (Circle) HOST SCHOOL CITY, STATE PRINCIPAL GRADE LEVEL(S)/SUBJECT TAUGHT COOPERATING TEACHER UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR 1 Copies: WHITE - University Supervisor YELLOW - Cooperating Teacher B. Demonstrates a deep understanding of the central concepts, assum ptions, structures, and p edagogy of thecontent area. Uses research-based classroom strategies that are grounded in higher order thinking, problem-solving, and real world connections for all students. 5 6 PINK – Student Teacher Performance Level B Proficient Performance Level C Advanced ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ________ Required Area to Strengthen Performance Performance Level B Level C Proficient Advanced Unsatisfactory Performance Level A Developing ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ________ Required Area to Strengthen Performance Performance Level B Level C Proficient Advanced Unsatisfactory Performance Level A Developing ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ DOMAI N III: Assessment and Evalua tion Indicators Uses appropriate evaluation and assessments to determine student mastery of content and make instructional decisions. B. Communicates student achievement and progress to students, their parents, and appropriate others C. Reflects on teaching practice through careful examination of classroom evaluation and assessments 4 Unsatisfactory DOMAI N II: Teaching Strategies Indicators A. 3 Performance Level A Developing DOMAI N I: Planning Indicators A. Establishes appropriate instructional goals and objectives B. Plans instruction and student evaluation based on an in-depth understanding of the content, student needs, curriculum standards, and the community C. Adapts instructional opportunities for diverse learners 2 A. Unsatisfactory Performance Level A Developing ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ DOMAIN IV: Learning Environment Indicators A. Creates a classroom culture that develops student intellectual capacity in the content area. B. Manages classroom resources effectively ________ Required Area to Strengthen Performance Performance Level B Level C Proficient Advanced Unsatisfactory Performance Level A Developing ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ DOMAI N V: Professional Growth Indicators A. Collaborates with colleagues and appropriate others B. Engages in high-quality, on-going professional development as defined by the Tennessee State Board of Education Professional Development Policy to strengthen knowledge and skill in the content of the teaching assignment. C. Performs professional responsibilities efficiently and effectively ________ Required Area to Strengthen Performance Performance Level B Level C Proficient Advanced ________ Required Area to Strengthen
VI. Cooperating Teacher Evaluation Forms The University of Tennessee at Martin Final Student Teaching Performance Assessment Evaluation b y Cooperating Teacher STUDENT TEACHER (Last, First, Middle) MAJOR/LICENSURE AREA DATE PREPARED HOST SCHOOL CITY, STATE PRINCIPAL GRADE LEVEL(S)/SUBJECT TAUGHT COOPERATING TEACHER UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR The cooperating teacher should complete this evaluation and ALL COPIES RETURNE D to the DIRECTOR OF FIELD EXPE RIENCES by Monday of the last week of the student teaching experience. Unsatisfactory Performance Level A Developing Performance Level B Proficient Performance Level C Advanced ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ DOMAI N I: Planning Indicators A. Establishes appropriate instructional goals and objectives B. Plans instruction and student evaluation based on an in-depth understanding of the content, student needs, curriculum standards, and the community C. Adapts instructional opportunities for diverse learners Unsatisfactory Performance Level A Developing ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ DOMAI N II: Teaching Strategies Indicators A. B. Demonstrates a deep understanding of the central concepts, assum ptions, structures, and pedagogy of the content area. Uses research-based classroom strategies that are grounded in higher order thinking, problem-solving, and real world connections for all students. ________ Required Area to Strengthen Performance Performance Level B Level C Proficient Advanced Unsatisfactory Performance Level A Developing ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ DOMAI N III: Assessment and Evalua tion Indicators Uses appropriate evaluation and assessments to determine student mastery of content and make instructional decisions. B. Communicates student achievement and progress to students, their parents, and appropriate others C. Reflects on teaching practice through careful examination of classroom evaluation and assessments ________ Required Area to Strengthen Performance Performance Level B Level C Proficient Advanced A. Unsatisfactory Performance Level A Developing ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ DOMAIN IV: Learning Environment Indicators A. Creates a classroom culture that develops student intellectual capacity in the content area. B. Manages classroom resources effectively ________ Required Area to Strengthen Performance Performance Level B Level C Proficient Advanced Unsatisfactory Performance Level A Developing ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ DOMAI N V: Professional Growth Indicators A. Collaborates with colleagues and appropriate others B. Engages in high-quality, on-going professional development as defined by the Tennessee State Board of Education Professional Development Policy to strengthen knowledge and skill in the content of the teaching assignment. C. Performs professional responsibilities efficiently and effectively ________ Required Area to Strengthen Performance Performance Level B Level C Proficient Advanced ________ Required Area to Strengthen
ASSESSMENT METHOD Reflects best practices Meets standards Needs development Reviewer comments or suggestions The assessment method describes, in detail: ☒ what the data source is (scores from exams, surveys, presentations, etc.) ☐ how the data will be gathered and by whom ☐ how often/when the data will be gathered ☒ who will evaluate/score it ☐ what the evaluation scale is (%? SD – SA? 0-5? P/F?) ☒ the criteria for acceptable performance (e.g., 85% pass rate, 75% score, 80% agree or strongly agree) ☒ who will review the results and when they will be reviewed ☐ The assessment isolates useful data* about the target learning outcome from other information. ☐ The assessment method is practical (i.e., it can be implemented with existing time and resources). ☐ All information is provided. ☐ The method includes sufficient detail to easily understand whether the assessment is appropriate for measuring the target learning outcome(s). ☐ The assessment isolates useful data* about the target learning outcome from other information. *Useful data means that your scores, responses, results, etc. are at an appropriate level of detail to provide information about just one learning outcome and provide an indication about what the program should retain or change. ☐ The assessment is practical. ☐ All information is provided, but some details need clarification. ☐ The assessment isolates useful data about the target learning outcome from other information. ☐ The assessment is practical. ☒ Not all information is provided. or ☒ Many details need clarification. or ☐ The assessment does not provide useful data about the target learning outcome. (e.g., retention rates (as data) don’t reveal whether students write well (where writing well is the target learning outcome)) or ☐ The assessment does not isolate data about the target learning outcome from other information. (In most cases, course grades as a data source fall under this category.) or ☐ The assessment is not practical. It’s unclear whether the data will be useful or whether it’s practical to gather. One category of the rubric is used for two outcomes , so it doesn’t completel y isolate data.